<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Future of Work and Digital Management Journal</JournalTitle>
      <Issn></Issn>
      <Volume>2</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Flexibility in Hybrid Work and Employee Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Work-Life Balance</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Flexibility in Hybrid Work and Employee Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Work-Life Balance</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>53</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>63</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>02</Month>
        <Day>17</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;table&gt;&#13;
&lt;tbody&gt;&#13;
&lt;tr&gt;&#13;
&lt;td&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;This study aimed to investigate whether work-life balance mediates the relationship between flexibility in hybrid work and employee well-being among Brazilian employees. A descriptive correlational research design was employed with a sample of 391 hybrid employees from various organizations in Brazil, selected based on the Morgan and Krejcie sampling table. Data were collected using three validated scales: the Work Design Questionnaire flexibility subscale, the Work-Life Balance Scale, and the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale. Pearson correlation coefficients were computed using SPSS-27 to assess the relationships between variables, while Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was conducted in AMOS-21 to test the hypothesized mediation model and evaluate model fit using standard indices. Pearson correlation results revealed significant positive associations between flexibility in hybrid work and work-life balance (r = .54, p &amp;lt; .001), flexibility and employee well-being (r = .48, p &amp;lt; .001), and work-life balance and employee well-being (r = .63, p &amp;lt; .001). The structural model demonstrated good fit (χ² = 114.28, df = 48, χ²/df = 2.38, GFI = 0.94, CFI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.058). SEM path analysis showed that flexibility had a significant direct effect on well-being (β = 0.21, p &amp;lt; .001) and an indirect effect through work-life balance (β = 0.31, p &amp;lt; .001), with a total effect of β = 0.52 (p &amp;lt; .001), confirming partial mediation. The findings suggest that flexibility in hybrid work positively influences employee well-being, both directly and indirectly through work-life balance. Enhancing flexible work practices alongside supportive policies for work-life integration can significantly contribute to employee psychological health and organizational sustainability in the hybrid era.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;/td&gt;&#13;
&lt;/tr&gt;&#13;
&lt;/tbody&gt;&#13;
&lt;/table&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">flexibility</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">hybrid work</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">work-life balance</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">employee well-being</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.journalfwdmj.com/index.php/fwdmj/article/download/31/33</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
