<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Future of Work and Digital Management Journal</JournalTitle>
      <Issn></Issn>
      <Volume>2</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 6</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Perceived AI Fairness and Organizational Commitment: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Perceived AI Fairness and Organizational Commitment: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>44</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>54</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>08</Month>
        <Day>19</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;table&gt;&#13;
&lt;tbody&gt;&#13;
&lt;tr&gt;&#13;
&lt;td&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;This study aimed to investigate the relationship between perceived AI fairness and organizational commitment, with psychological safety examined as a potential mediating variable. A descriptive correlational design was employed using a sample of 443 employees from public and private sector organizations in Indonesia. The sample size was determined using the Morgan and Krejcie table for large populations. Standardized instruments were used to measure organizational commitment (Organizational Commitment Questionnaire by Mowday et al., 1979), psychological safety (Psychological Safety Scale by Edmondson, 1999), and perceived AI fairness (Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making Scale by Lee, 2018). Data were analyzed using SPSS-27 for descriptive and Pearson correlation statistics, and AMOS-21 for structural equation modeling (SEM). Model fit was assessed using established indices including χ²/df, CFI, TLI, GFI, AGFI, and RMSEA. Perceived AI fairness was significantly and positively correlated with organizational commitment (r = .39, p &amp;lt; .001) and psychological safety (r = .51, p &amp;lt; .001). Psychological safety was also positively correlated with organizational commitment (r = .47, p &amp;lt; .001). SEM results confirmed good model fit (χ²/df = 2.47, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.057) and demonstrated that perceived AI fairness significantly predicted psychological safety (β = 0.51, p &amp;lt; .001), which in turn predicted organizational commitment (β = 0.39, p &amp;lt; .001). The indirect effect of AI fairness on commitment through psychological safety was also significant (β = 0.20, p &amp;lt; .001), indicating partial mediation. The findings suggest that perceived fairness in AI systems contributes to higher organizational commitment, both directly and through enhanced psychological safety. Organizations should consider both technological transparency and supportive interpersonal environments to foster employee trust and engagement in AI-integrated workplaces.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;/td&gt;&#13;
&lt;/tr&gt;&#13;
&lt;/tbody&gt;&#13;
&lt;/table&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Perceived AI Fairness</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Psychological Safety</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Organizational Commitment</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.journalfwdmj.com/index.php/fwdmj/article/download/44/45</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
